GCLONGWAIT
10-05 05:41 PM
Hello,
My husband is on pending I-485 MTR & my denied I-140 is in appeal. My husband has to apply for H-4 status based on my approved & stamped H-1 status.
My Queries:
1) I am told that he cannot apply from USA as his I-485 is denied and he is pending I-485 MTR?
2) Can he apply for canadian visa for H4 consulate processing even though he doesn't have valid USA stamp on his passport? All we have is pending I-485 MTR receipt & my pending appeal letter from AAO office.
3) How safe is it to apply from canada?
Your response will be highly appreciated.
Thanx in advance
My husband is on pending I-485 MTR & my denied I-140 is in appeal. My husband has to apply for H-4 status based on my approved & stamped H-1 status.
My Queries:
1) I am told that he cannot apply from USA as his I-485 is denied and he is pending I-485 MTR?
2) Can he apply for canadian visa for H4 consulate processing even though he doesn't have valid USA stamp on his passport? All we have is pending I-485 MTR receipt & my pending appeal letter from AAO office.
3) How safe is it to apply from canada?
Your response will be highly appreciated.
Thanx in advance
wallpaper of allure magazine -e ai
sreedhar_ch
09-28 06:25 PM
Hi,
I-140 Approval alien(A#) number is not matching with I-485,EAD,AP Receipt notice, please let me know any one of you also having same issue.
I-140 Approval alien(A#) number is not matching with I-485,EAD,AP Receipt notice, please let me know any one of you also having same issue.
sethuraj
03-29 08:12 PM
My wife came to USA on H4 visa in January 2004. Later when she got a job, she changed that to H1B in September 2004. Since we do not yet have the EAD or green card, her company is now filing the Perm labor certifcation, to make sure that she gets the 7th year extension of H1B. The rule is that you should file the labor before the 6th year starts.
My question is when does her 5th year ends. Was it on January 2009 based on her arrival in USA or is it on Sepetember 2009 sincw her H1B visa started only on Septemeber 2004?
Please reply.
Thank you
My question is when does her 5th year ends. Was it on January 2009 based on her arrival in USA or is it on Sepetember 2009 sincw her H1B visa started only on Septemeber 2004?
Please reply.
Thank you
2011 Allure Magazine - February
atlgc
09-15 02:01 PM
how real or possible in getting visitor visa for my brother .
he is under 30 and working in a non -it field and he is married but spouse doesn't work but studied M.tech in CS(just completed)they want to visit us for a month.myself and spouse both are h1-b and 485 applied. and he will be going to chennai consulate in india.
he is under 30 and working in a non -it field and he is married but spouse doesn't work but studied M.tech in CS(just completed)they want to visit us for a month.myself and spouse both are h1-b and 485 applied. and he will be going to chennai consulate in india.
more...
monkeyfresh
11-14 05:28 PM
I am available to work on a freelance basis, and very enthusiastic about creating interesting and unique Flash based projects. I have extensive experience in working in a freelance environment as I've been making my living as a freelance Flash developer for two years.
Please feel free to visit my web site to attain a thorough understanding of my capabilities.
dubko productions (http://www.dubko.com)
Thank you
Please feel free to visit my web site to attain a thorough understanding of my capabilities.
dubko productions (http://www.dubko.com)
Thank you
askreddy
08-07 10:53 AM
.....
more...
conchshell
12-31 07:28 PM
Dear fellow members,
Wish you all a happy and cheerful new year 2009. Wish that both EB2 and EB3 become current in this new year, and bring much sought peace of mind to everyone. May legal immigration becomes one of the top priority for Obama administration. :)
Wish you all a happy and cheerful new year 2009. Wish that both EB2 and EB3 become current in this new year, and bring much sought peace of mind to everyone. May legal immigration becomes one of the top priority for Obama administration. :)
2010 Jennifer Aniston Allure
bodhi_tree
02-28 04:17 PM
Can anyone who's filed for H1 recently tell me how long does it typically take to receive the receipt notice after the petition reaches the vermont center ?
Thankyou
Thankyou
more...
pghodgao
08-24 12:25 PM
Hello,
I need to renew my H1 for the 9th year and was wondering if I need to pay the ACWIA fee of $1500. It seems employers who are filing for a 2nd extension are exempt from paying. Does it apply also to cases beyond the 2nd extension?
Thanks to all in advance.
I need to renew my H1 for the 9th year and was wondering if I need to pay the ACWIA fee of $1500. It seems employers who are filing for a 2nd extension are exempt from paying. Does it apply also to cases beyond the 2nd extension?
Thanks to all in advance.
hair Jennifer Aniston Hated The
kirupa
04-30 07:28 PM
Aww - that's so nice. (Pets the stamp) :)
more...
ansari
10-29 09:50 PM
Hello,
If one gets stuck with H1b revalidation, and then gets approved after 6 months. Is there any issues when coming back to the US at the POE entry?
Please let me know.
S
If one gets stuck with H1b revalidation, and then gets approved after 6 months. Is there any issues when coming back to the US at the POE entry?
Please let me know.
S
hot Actress Jennifer Aniston told
susvin
09-26 04:42 PM
Hi,
My company filed for my GC in June'07. They goofed up and filed under EB-3 instead of EB-2. The company apologized and is ready to change my filing to EB-2. I am wondering whether this would be a good step? Following are my details.
- My PD is June07
- Labor is approved (in 1 week)
- I-140 approved
- My 6 yrs on H1 were completed in July09
- I have received 3 yr H1 ext
- Me & Spouse both have received EAD (I am not using my EAD card)
I am not tracking the progress of visa number availablilty, but I presume that EB-2 would anyday be better than EB-3.
Please advise whether chnaging to EB-2 would be a good idea?
rgds,
susvin
My company filed for my GC in June'07. They goofed up and filed under EB-3 instead of EB-2. The company apologized and is ready to change my filing to EB-2. I am wondering whether this would be a good step? Following are my details.
- My PD is June07
- Labor is approved (in 1 week)
- I-140 approved
- My 6 yrs on H1 were completed in July09
- I have received 3 yr H1 ext
- Me & Spouse both have received EAD (I am not using my EAD card)
I am not tracking the progress of visa number availablilty, but I presume that EB-2 would anyday be better than EB-3.
Please advise whether chnaging to EB-2 would be a good idea?
rgds,
susvin
more...
house Image. Barbie blonde Jennifer
ilyaslamasse
03-12 04:03 PM
Then I can't add actions to the frames and stuff...
pom 0]
pom 0]
tattoo hot of allure magazine -e ai
vls
02-19 04:22 PM
Hi Folks,
I would like to know if there is any issue to enter the USA using the Parole document if I never had the H1B visa stamped on my passport.
If anyone can advise, I appreciate!
Thanks!
__________________
Signed up for recurring contribution of $20 per month since Jan-07.
I would like to know if there is any issue to enter the USA using the Parole document if I never had the H1B visa stamped on my passport.
If anyone can advise, I appreciate!
Thanks!
__________________
Signed up for recurring contribution of $20 per month since Jan-07.
more...
pictures Jennifer Aniston in Allure
priderock
04-20 06:40 PM
I got my labor approved in Jan (EB2 - RIR) , I say EB2 because because all the documentation was done supporting EB2 (BS + 5 years). My job requires that and I meet the criteria.
However, when Applying my I140 , the lawyer screwed up and filed under EB3 and got approved.
I very much want to go for EB2. Is it possible to file I140 again under EB2 with the same LC? If I want to re-file, do I have to or do they (USICS) cancel my previous I140 approval ?
Is filing another LC under PERM and I140 safer route than using the current LC ?
What is the best course of action ?
I know there is a clear advantage today in being in EB2 over EB3 (PD wise) and it looks like most people are converting from EB3 to EB2. I am not sure whether there will be any advantage of being in EB2 over EB3 by the time my PD (oct 04) becomes current.
Any input is appreciated. Thanks in advance guys.
However, when Applying my I140 , the lawyer screwed up and filed under EB3 and got approved.
I very much want to go for EB2. Is it possible to file I140 again under EB2 with the same LC? If I want to re-file, do I have to or do they (USICS) cancel my previous I140 approval ?
Is filing another LC under PERM and I140 safer route than using the current LC ?
What is the best course of action ?
I know there is a clear advantage today in being in EB2 over EB3 (PD wise) and it looks like most people are converting from EB3 to EB2. I am not sure whether there will be any advantage of being in EB2 over EB3 by the time my PD (oct 04) becomes current.
Any input is appreciated. Thanks in advance guys.
dresses Jennifer Aniston Allure Cover.
Macaca
07-28 04:46 PM
Reid Eyes Rules Changes To Restrict Amendments (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_10/news/19488-1.html) By Emily Pierce, ROLL CALL STAFF, July 23, 2007
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
more...
makeup Jennifer Aniston Allure
snhn
11-22 07:34 PM
Hello,
this is a bit different maybe since it deals with my mom. She was sponsored by my sister. She has been stuck in name check now for about 18 monts. Anyways, she is out of the country. She just left, and now my sister got a letter and appoinment letter for a 2nd finger print. My mother is using her advacne parole and the green card was filed for adjustment of status.
so the questiong is can my sister reschedule the appointment 8 months in the future or can she change the location for finger print to the office in the country where my mother is,
She is in Pakistan right now.
thanks
this is a bit different maybe since it deals with my mom. She was sponsored by my sister. She has been stuck in name check now for about 18 monts. Anyways, she is out of the country. She just left, and now my sister got a letter and appoinment letter for a 2nd finger print. My mother is using her advacne parole and the green card was filed for adjustment of status.
so the questiong is can my sister reschedule the appointment 8 months in the future or can she change the location for finger print to the office in the country where my mother is,
She is in Pakistan right now.
thanks
girlfriend Jennifer Aniston Allure
serg
07-17 10:33 PM
Infopass?
hairstyles Jennifer Aniston Allure
calboy78
07-25 07:42 PM
Pl take this poll - this will shed some light on how fast is USCIS
(1) 485 filed during June and receipted
(2) 485 filed on/after July 1 and receipted
Thanks.
(1) 485 filed during June and receipted
(2) 485 filed on/after July 1 and receipted
Thanks.
Macaca
07-28 04:46 PM
Reid Eyes Rules Changes To Restrict Amendments (http://www.rollcall.com/issues/53_10/news/19488-1.html) By Emily Pierce, ROLL CALL STAFF, July 23, 2007
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
After nearly seven months of battling Republican filibusters and controversial amendments on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Friday he may seek to change Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor.
Reid said Rules and Administration Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would be tasked with exploring what rules changes should be made.
Noting that there has been a "growing breakdown between the majority and minority in terms of how to get things done," Howard Gantman, Feinstein's chief of staff for the Rules panel, said the committee would conduct a "comprehensive review" and look at the rules on the germaneness of amendments and how long Senators have to review proposals before voting on them.
"Sen. Feinstein is very serious about looking at the vast range of amendments that are brought in at the last minute that are not germane," said Gantman. He added that the panel's focus would be on "how to better get things done."
Reid spokesman Jim Manley cautioned that Reid "has no intention of unilaterally seeking a rules change."
However, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) scoffed at the notion of limiting or restricting Senators' ability to offer amendments, which he likened to freedom of speech.
"Look, nobody's going to shut anybody up in the Senate," he said at a press conference Friday. "There's going to be robust debate. You can just write that down. And I understand Sen. Reid's frustrations, but we're not going to establish any speech police in the Senate - not now, not ever."
Reid apparently reached his boiling point Thursday night when Republicans used Senate budget rules to offer a number of non-germane amendments to a student loan financing bill.
"What went on last night was ridiculous," Reid said on the Senate floor. "We should change those rules. ... We will have to take a look at that."
Reid said Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and ranking member Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.) managed the student loan measure "very well until it ran into the rule that we have here that allows unending amendments on any subject forever, literally, before you get to final passage."
Because the higher education bill - by virtue of its status as a budget reconciliation measure - was immune to filibuster, Senate rules permitted unlimited amendments to be offered and voted on. On Thursday night, in particular, Senators were given only a few minutes to review the substance of some amendments before they were asked to vote on them.
As is customary with budget and reconciliation measures, Senators engaged in a long series of back-to-back votes, known as a "vote-a-rama," at the end of the debate. But Democrats said Republicans' insistence on having 14 non-germane votes - including six related to cutting taxes, three related to immigration and two related to terrorism - was excessive.
When Democrats pushed back with their own non-germane amendment expressing the Senate's opinion that President Bush should not pardon Vice President Cheney's former chief of staff, Scooter Libby, Republicans tried to force a vote on former President Bill Clinton's controversial pardons.
But before the Senate could vote on that, Reid asked that both the Libby vote and the GOP pardons amendment be stricken from the Congressional Record, and the chamber voted on final passage of the bill.
Manley explained: "These so-called vote-a-ramas are bad for the system, and they may lead to bad policy. As have leaders in the past, all Sen. Reid was doing was expressing his frustration at the Republicans' desire to score cheap political points at the expense of a good-faith effort to pass a bill that will make college education more affordable for more Americans."
Even though Reid is seeking a Rules panel review, the rules governing Thursday night's debate actually fall under the Congressional Budget Act. If Reid were to seek a change in the Budget Act, the Senate would have to pass legislation and it would have to be signed into law by the president.
However, changes to Senate rules require 67 votes to pass.
fromnaija
01-10 02:23 PM
Guys,
I remember I have seen this in some thread but I can't find it now. So I am repeating question here:
My receipt number starts with EAC. In order to check processing times, which service center I should be looking at?
Thanks,
And for the umpteenth time....
EAC - Vermont
WAC - California
LIN - Nebraska
SRC - Texas
I remember I have seen this in some thread but I can't find it now. So I am repeating question here:
My receipt number starts with EAC. In order to check processing times, which service center I should be looking at?
Thanks,
And for the umpteenth time....
EAC - Vermont
WAC - California
LIN - Nebraska
SRC - Texas
No comments:
Post a Comment